Waste management solutions

waste in the world

The Clock is Ticking

We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: waste won’t go away. No matter what we do or how fast we do it, waste will always be a part of life.

However, given the fact that waste won’t go away, businesses have to keep on top of their waste before a simple fact of business and life becomes a greater problem

The longer businesses take to realize the importance of waste, the more money they will lose.

The importance of waste

With waste, time is money, and the sooner companies become involved, the sooner they can realize a greater profit. Time spent without effective waste management leads to more waste.

More waste without efficient waste management forces companies to rely on expensive and inefficient disposal methods. We want to help our clients avoid the expense, hassle, and inefficiency that so many companies have felt themselves chained to.

We feel that the constantly looming presence of time works to the advantage of our customers. When it comes to saving money, businesses realize the importance of action. For our clients, this translates into an eagerness to get involved, making it even easier to find and keep clients.

By approaching waste management consulting with the idea that time is of the essence, we have been able to pass on to our clients a sense of how important it is to streamline waste management now.

They have proven that they can save (and make) thousands of dollars for each client. There’s no need to wait, because waste won’t go away. The time is now to make money by saving money.

Waste management efficiency

When it comes to waste management, efficiency is key. In fact, waste is the product of inefficiency. However, most businesses are not wasteful by choice. They are simply unaware of the possibilities that are available to help capitalize on excess materials and waste.

Once waste is created, money has to be spent in order to get rid of it. Not only is this a cost most businesses would like to avoid, but it’s energy spent at a complete loss for every party involved.

Reducing waste reduces the unnecessary consumption of energy. In doing so, both renewable and non renewable resources are preserved – saving money for businesses in the short and long term.

In the short term, businesses can save money when it comes to removing waste. Instead of paying someone too much to haul their waste away, we can help them find a more cost efficient waste management plan that will benefit both the company and the environment on a number of levels.

One such level is recycling. There are a very attractive option for clients due to experience when it comes to recycling. The experience with various forms of recycling has saved companies thousands of dollars that they had no idea they could save.

Additionally, at Minneapolis Dumpster Rental Corp we are capable of becoming a gateway for their clients to profit from their own waste. While it may sound bizarre, it is far from impossible.

The materials exchange program allows for companies to list their waste materials in order to find alternative disposal methods, reduce the cost of transportation and disposal, and locate companies which may be able to use their waste.

By helping companies become even more efficient, we reduce the amount of waste they create. While there will always be some level of waste, less waste allows companies to utilize every resource to its fullest – making us a precious commodity to every company (and the greater community as well).

Pollution is more deadly than viruses

According to a report from the University of Montreal, air pollution kills more people than viruses – including COVID-19 – and wars combined.

The professor at the Faculty of Medicine at UdeM and environmental cardiology expert François Reeves compared the two problems in his study.
According to Health Canada, 15,000 people die each year in Canada from the direct impact of pollution on the body. Quebec residents represent a quarter of this sample. Specifically, 70% of these deaths are believed to be due to a dysfunction of the cardiovascular system.

Pollution is also estimated to cost $ 114 billion annually in health care and disability benefits worldwide. A large effort in good waste management systems, recycling and improved industrial processes in really needed at this time.

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that pollution is the leading cause of death worldwide with around seven million victims annually. As of Thursday, COVID-19 was responsible for 140,000 deaths, comparatively less.

The slowdown in human activity could thus save more lives than the coronavirus will have cut, it is believed at the UdeM. This is a very likely assumption although it will take time to test it according to Dr. Reeves.

Closely linked viruses and pollution

The doctor’s report also shows that the areas most affected by the COVID-19 coronavirus are those that are most exposed to pollution.

Dr. Reeves therefore understands that the lungs of citizens are weakened by poor air quality and that a high level of pollution promotes contamination.

On the other hand, with people leaving their homes less frequently during a pandemic, the effect on perceived smog rates around the world was almost immediate.

Suddenly, we have probably reached the most daring greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets set by international climate conferences according to experts. In India, people have rediscovered the Himalayan summit, which had disappeared in smog for years. Elsewhere, the stars are suddenly visible.

Concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), produced mainly by vehicles and thermal power plants, fell 54% in Paris and about 45% in Madrid, Milan and Rome during containment, according to maps released by the European Space Agency.

From March 13 to April 13, 2020, NO2 concentrations decreased by 54% in the French capital, by 49% in Rome, by 48% in Madrid and by 47% in Milan, according to the ASE, compared to the averages recorded in March / April 2019. These data include a margin of error of plus or minus 15%.

The steep declines coincide with the strict quarantine measures in place across Europe. This reduction is remarkable, noted climate experts from the European Space Agency.

The agency initially focused on these cities thanks to satellite data cloudless and in general with less significant climate impacts than in other regions which may have an impact on NO2 measurements.

NO2, a gas causing significant inflammation of the respiratory tract, is a pollutant with a short lifespan, which makes it a good indicator of the intensity of human activities.These maps are based on the work of the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, which plans to publish other data for northern European countries.

We are not sure that this will develop in the same way in the northern countries where containment has been managed differently than in France, Spain and Italy. “Clouds and weather can also have a big impact on measurements.

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is responsible for 68,000 premature deaths per year in the European Union, including 7,500 in France, according to the latest European Environment Agency air quality report for 2019 .

Are lithium-ion batteries clean

The 2019 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to the designers of lithium batteries, used in smartphones, computers, electric cars. Rechargeable, they are touted as “clean”. But are they really?

The 2019 Nobel Prize winners were announced in October last year. The Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded to those who discovered the molecular reaction to variations in oxygen, then that of Physics went to a trio at the origin of the first discoveries of exoplanets. Then it was the Nobel Prize in chemistry’s turn: John Goodenough, Stanley Whittingham and Akira Yoshino were awarded this prestigious prize for having designed lithium (or lithium-ion / li-ion) batteries.

This invention revolutionized our lives according to the Nobel Prize winners. And indeed, we find lithium-ion batteries in our everyday technological tools: batteries, smartphones, tablets, computers and even in electric cars. In addition to being the lightest metal in the world, the advantage of the resulting batteries is that they are rechargeable. With their work, the Nobel prize winners laid the foundation for a wireless society and freed from fossil fuels according to the award jury.

But, in addition to too partial or even non-existent recycling, the production of lithium batteries is far from not posing any ecological threat.

Lithium extraction: a water disaster

In the digital age, demand for metal is exponential. If a smartphone contains only a few grams of lithium, an electric car – whose production is only growing – needs it by several kilograms. If 2 million electric vehicles were sold in 2018, that should increase to 10 million in 2025, then 28 million in 2030, according to estimates by Bloomberg.

The price of the product also increases, logically at the same time as demand. In short, a metal like lithium has become the new gold and it’s probably not about to change.

For the lithium mining countries, Australia, Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, the economic stakes are enormous. This is not without ecological consequences due to the ever higher extraction of this metal. In its February 2019 issue, National Geographic magazine pointed to the “white gold rush” in Bolivia: the world’s largest salt desert is threatened. Since 17% of planetary lithium is found in its depths, mine construction is increasing, in defiance of all ecological regulations.

The fragile ecosystem of this precious desert is threatened. The region is arid and the population suffers from a lack of fresh water. However, the extraction of lithium requires drawing precisely, liters and liters of water.

The process actually involves digging a hole in order to pump brine into the groundwater. The aqueous substance remains in the air for several months in tanks, so that it can evaporate, which forms a mixture which is filtered before recovering the lithium.

The same problem of overexploitation of freshwater occurs in the salt desert of Chile, one of the largest places in the world for lithium production. Not only are populations drying up, especially the surrounding farms which are in difficulty, but the environment is also deteriorating because plants and trees are wasting away.

Politics on the alleged lithium pollution

The depletion of water resources therefore represents a real challenge, quite incontestable in the face of lithium. On the other hand, scientific studies are lacking concerning a possible direct pollution of the production of lithium. It is not possible to arrive at a generic rule establishing whether it is polluting or not, as the extraction methods can vary. However, this issue is swelling more and more through testimonies and alerts from NGOs.

For some years now, Tibetans have been complaining about a lithium mine installed by China in Sichuan province. Locals report leaks of chemicals, polluting water and killing animals. This is said to be the result of the use of hydrochloric acid to facilitate the lithium evaporation process. The transformation of lithium also requires toxic chemicals.

The exploration of lithium has important ecological and social consequences on the places of extraction, in particular because of the pollution and the exhaustion of water resources according to NGO Friends of the Earth. In its report, the organization is concerned that the transformation of lithium also requires toxic chemicals. Communities, ecosystems and the food produced can be dangerously exposed to releases.

If the invention of lithium-ion batteries has indeed revolutionized our lives, and it is not a question of questioning the legitimacy of this Nobel Prize, it is nevertheless necessary to be careful. How many bin rentals will be needed to remove all the hazardous materials generated from lithium mining and transformation?

They can certainly allow us to get out of fossil fuels, but we must have no angelism on an alleged green or clean aspect of these batteries. And by the way interesting alternatives are emerging, such as fluoride batteries.

Air Pollution Reduces Life Expectancy the Most

While the threat of the coronavirus is shaking the world, researchers draw our attention to another danger, that they consider more impacting than wars, malaria, AIDS or smoking. This is air pollution.

Globally, smoking is responsible for a loss of life expectancy of 2.2 years on average. It causes 7.2 million deaths every year. AIDS shortens life expectancy by 0.7 years on average. It causes 1 million victims a year. For malaria, we speak of a reduced life expectancy of 0.6 years and 600,000 deaths per year. Wars cause a decrease in life expectancy of 0.3 years and 530,000 annual deaths.

But, according to a study by German researchers, the scourge that surpasses all of these is air pollution. It shortens life expectancy around the world by 3 years on average. In 2015, it caused 8.8 million premature deaths!

These figures show that in terms of loss of life expectancy, air pollution exceeds malaria by a factor of 19 and violence by a factor of 16. Alcohol by a factor of 45 and abuse of a factor of 60. Since the impact of air pollution on public health as a whole is much greater than expected and is a global phenomenon, scientists believe that there is an air pollution pandemic.

In Africa and South Asia, in low-income countries, children are particularly affected by air pollution. But this is not the case elsewhere in the world. The number of years of life lost due to air pollution is in total,an average of 233 million years per year. ©

Cardiovascular Research

This is a pandemic that strikes differently according to regions and ages. Going into detail, the researchers found that cardiovascular disease is responsible for the largest proportion of premature death due to air pollution. They account for 43% of the loss of life expectancy in the world. They also noted that air pollution had a greater effect on shortening the lives of the elderly. Globally, about 75% of deaths from air pollution occur in people over the age of 60.

The researchers also wanted to distinguish the effects of pollution of human origin from that from natural sources (desert dust, volcanism, forest fires, etc.). They show that two thirds of premature deaths are attributable to human pollution, in particular due to the use of fossil fuels. They thus think that by eliminating these emissions specifically, the average life expectancy in the world would increase by just over a year.

Five and a half million deaths are preventable each year. But the impact could be even greater depending on the region. In East Asia, three to four years of life could be gained. Overall five and a half million deaths are preventable every year.

In 2015, air pollution caused 8.8 million premature deaths. Overall, it shortens life expectancy by 3 years. Given its impact on global public health, researchers speak of an unparalleled pandemic as air pollution kills twice as much as previously thought. Pollution is responsible for nearly 800,000 deaths a year in Europe and 8.8 million worldwide, according to a new study. In France, one death in 1,000 is therefore attributable to poor air quality.

Air pollution due to fine particles is responsible for the deaths of 48,000 people each year in France. Every year, almost 800,000 people in Europe die prematurely due to air pollution. Between 40 and 80% of these premature deaths are due to cardiovascular disease, estimate German researchers.

Pollution Kills More Than Tobacco

This means that air pollution kills more people each year than tobacco, responsible for 7.2 million deaths in 2015 according to the World Health Organization (WHO). However if we can avoid smoking, we cannot avoid being exposed to polluted air.

Researchers estimate that 790,000 people died from air pollution in 2015 across Europe, including 659,000 in the 28 states of the European Union. An estimate significantly higher than that of the European Environment Agency (EEA). In its annual report published in October, it judged that air pollution with very fine particles (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2, emitted by diesel engines) and ozone (O3) was responsible in 2015 for 518,000 premature deaths in 41 European countries, and 480,000 in the EU.

This new study is mainly devoted to Europe, but its authors have also applied their calculation method to the whole world. They arrive at the astronomical figure of 8.8 million deaths caused by air pollution in 2015 worldwide, including 2.8 million for China. Previous work rather estimated the world total at 4.5 million. To revise these figures, the German researchers used a new statistical tool, based on a model simulating the way atmospheric gases interact with chemical compounds derived from human activity (energy production, industry, transport, agriculture). They then combined this data with mortality rates and exposure. They used new risk analyzes based on epidemiological data much larger than before and from 16 countries.

Pollution leads to 105 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants in France. On average, the global excess mortality attributed to air pollution by this study is 120 deaths per year per 100,000 inhabitants. This rate is higher in Europe (133), although the controls are stricter there than in other regions. This is due to the combination of poor air quality and a high population density, which results in exposure among the highest in the world,.

Eastern Europe is particularly affected, with 36,000 deaths per year for Romania or 76,000 for Ukraine, i.e. rates higher than 200 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants. For France, the rate is 105 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants, compared to 98 in the United Kingdom or 154 in Germany.

The study authors consider it urgent to lower the exposure limits for fine particles. The average annual limit for PM2.5 set by the European Union is 25 micrograms per cubic meter, or 2.5 times more than the WHO recommendations. Since most of the fine particles and other air pollutants in Europe come from the combustion of fossil fuels, it is urgent to switch to other sources of energy.

In addition there is an underestimated cardiovascular risk. This work seems to show that the cardiovascular risk linked to air pollution has been underestimated. Previously scientists focused on the risks of cancer linked to air pollution or the immediate effects on the respiratory system. Now, they understand better the link with heart problems, effects on the brain or reproductive issues.